CDC bombshell admission says PCR tests are unreliable, leaving declared COVID19 pandemic in question
NSW Chief Health Officer Dr Kerry Chant (pictured) has done little to inspire confidence in her understanding the limitations of the PCR tests utilised to diagnose COVID-19
A bombshell statement on the CDC website has admitted the PCR tests used to detect active COVID-19 cases are flawed and to be replaced.
The admission confirms what many who researched the tests have known for some time - that the tests don't work in this application.
This confirmation has enormous implications on Australia's current lockdowns and quarantines, including NSW's current state of emergency declared by Premier Gladys Berejiklian.
The statement released by the WHO revealed on their website said by the end of 2021, a manual readjustment of the PCR positivity threshold must be reviewed to allow for 'background noise' in specimens with high cycle thresholds.
The message reads, 'After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only.
'CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
'CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses'.
The admittance backs up what numerous health experts worldwide have stated and been silenced; high cycle thresholds can lead to false positives as the PCR test can replicate any DNA material.
In other words, no one can confirm if a person has COVID-19 if they do not exhibit symptoms of the disease, now putting all asymptomatic cases in question.
The Australian government is yet to make a statement around the shock admission with the announcement from the WHO leaving PCR testing strategies and ongoing case confirmations and management in question.
Kary Mullis explains why the PCR test cannot be used as a diagnostic tool for any disease, including the positive diagnosis of COVID-19
The 'gold standard' Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify.
The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the 'cycle threshold' or 'CT value'. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.
Dr Kary Mullis (pictured) won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for copying and amplifying DNA
According to the privately owned World Health Organisation (WHO) any result from a RT-PCR test cycled higher than above 35CT is potentially a false positive.
Yet Australian health authorities have confirmed on the official Government Health Pathology website we are cycling the tests at a CT of 40-45.
This means any reported cases - particularly in respect to those without symptoms - are unreliable, begging the question of how many times the government and its 'experts' are in fact cycling tests in order to manipulate a positive result.
'Generally, the number of cycles run by the PCR systems is 45, however this can vary depending on the machine or assay used. Generally the cut-off or threshold is set at a Ct of 40. However this is set by the manufacturer’s instructions as well as the validation processes required by all Australian laboratories'.
There is no transparency in the use of this test that is now allowing government’s globally to claim that healthy people without disease symptoms are an asymptomatic case of disease.
The definition of a pandemic that is based on an increase in ‘cases’ of a disease has not been validated by the scientific community. It is not a scientific definition if it has not been validated by the community of scientists – only by chosen State Premiers 'health experts'.
Dr David Martin (pictured) has revealed the COVID-19 virus was patented under gain of function research undertaken by the US and China between 2008 and 2017
The disclosure further extends to the validity of contact tracing via checking in via a QR-code, which is the tracking of healthy people.
This being the case in all countries, the WHO should not have declared a ‘global pandemic’. The ‘cases’ of disease that the media is presenting are healthy people who have had a PCR test but have no symptoms. It is these cases in healthy people that are being used to close borders and quarantine healthy people in Australia.
This makes the use of the emergency powers invalid along with all directives used to enacted a lockdown and current NSW state of emergency.
US politician Candice Owens tweeted acknowledgment that many had been aware of the flawed PCR testing yet had been dismissed as 'conspiracy theorists'
It has been revealed by Dr. David Martin that the COVID-19 virus was patented between 2008-2017 under gain of function research carried out in the US and in Wuhan China.
The pandemic has been declared using statistics out of context to encourage the Australian community to accept the governments new regulations and restrictions.